Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Gun control discussion morphs into debate over SGA’s role at university

Staff Reporter

Published: Thursday, February 21, 2013

Updated: Thursday, February 21, 2013 01:02


Jay R. Jordan | The Houstonian

SGA Senators lead a discussion on the on-campus concealed carry gun bill.

Stephen Green contributed to this report

A debate over gun control led to the debate over the role the student government plays in relation to representing the student body during their Tuesday night meeting.  

Some members, including the president and chief of staff, believe students elected the group to vote on their behalf. Others say the matter is too big for a group of 23 students to speak on behalf of the entire student body.

S013-2 the “Sam Houston Personal Protection Bill” would put support behind the idea that students should be able to carry concealed weapons on campus with the proper permit.

Rules and Regulations Chief Steven Perry proposed the amendment that sparked the discussion and would put the bill up for a student vote during the Spring 2013 election cycle.

“For the first time, I am truly embarrassed,” Perry said after the amendment failed. “When the student body says that they should make this decision and not (SGA), that’s (the student’s) decision to make.”

Of the 23 members of the Senate, only eight members were directly voted into the organization by students during their election. The rest were all elected internally, something Perry says causes a problem in cases like these.

“You have no mandate,” he said. “You can come in here every week and play government, but this is something that actually matters.”

SGA President Shane Rankin said the organization had the right to vote on the bill and represent the student’s opinion.

“We are elected to represent our constituents in the way the want to be represented,” Rankin said. “I think SGA fulfills the role of representing students. We are elected by the students for the students.”

He and Sen. Josh Beaman, author of the legislation, are demanding a public apology from Perry.

“Senators should be on their best behavior,” Rankin said. “Perry wasn’t.”

Chief of Staff Ramiro Jaime said students wouldn’t have the patience to read the bill all the way through before placing their vote.

“I was hoping that we'd vote on it tonight, not necessarily for the fact of convenience, but just for the fact that I stated that people aren't going to read the bill,” Jaime said. “It's just like [situation of] Obamacare. It's doesn't matter whether you're for or against it. Both parties, whether for or against it, didn't read the bill and it was voted on.”

Several senators and students took offense to the statement, which they say called them lazy or unintelligent.

Jaime said this wasn’t his intent.

 “Basically, I just wanted to point out that I wasn't calling stupid lazy I was sating the fact that we are all students and nobody reads those emails,” he said.

Several students spoke in favor of the amendment while none spoke against it. Only a handful of senators actually voted to pass the amendment. The vote was not taken by roll call so precise numbers are not available.

The SGA elections will be held April 3 and 4. All referendums that are put up in the general elections must be voted on by 10 percent of the student body, or more than 1,800 students.

During the meeting, Sen. Spencer Copeland redacted his amendment that would require UPD to collect and maintain a list of campus community members with concealed handgun licenses. His reason was that there’s a list that already contains that information and is easily accessible to UPD.

Three other amendments were passed by SGA that corrected improper grammar and wording in the original bill.

Perry’s motion to have the bill tabled until the next meeting passed.

They will meet again on Tuesday to discuss and possibly vote on the bill.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you


Thu Feb 21 2013 23:25
OK... Regardless of who you people that are commenting are, see you have opinions that deserve to be heard, just like the rest of the student body. Let the students vote on this issue! This is too big and far too important for just a handful of people to vote on, regardless of if they were voted in by us, the students. (Which very few of them actually were by the way) All I'm saying is that every senator that voted against the amendement that gave the students the ability to vote on this issue were in the wrong and they know that. They just figured that the students would vote the legislation down so the mainly Greek senate stuck together and decided they would say screw you to anyone else's opinions. They did what they wanted, not what the students wanted, and that is an injustice in itself.
Thu Feb 21 2013 22:41
Last time I checked whether you are Republican or Democrat the Constitution is still the law of the land. The rights we have in this country do not discriminate...and it is the second amendment, right behind freedom of speech...which means it must be pretty important.
Thu Feb 21 2013 18:41
The fact that most Senators who appear in support of the bill are proud Republicans and most Senators who appear in opposition of the bill are Democrats would suggest that this issue is always about political parties.
Thu Feb 21 2013 18:13
To the first commenter on this article, the bill would not "allow EVERY student to carry a weapon"... The bill is for CONCEALED CARRY which means for those who have a CHL, not every student on campus. Considering you have to be 21 to take the course, that automatically limits who would be carrying. And as for "the far right" being too powerful, it has nothing to do with political parties but everything to do with the second amendment. If I don't like something then I won't participate, simple as that. But I would NEVER tell somebody they weren't allowed to exercise their Constitutional rights because I simply disagreed with it.
Thu Feb 21 2013 13:02
If 23 persons can usurp the right of 18,000+ students to vote and decide whether they want to allow every student to carry a weapon when in fact the U.S. Military does not allow its active duty soldiers (who are trained arms experts) to carry weapons, this shows how powerful The Far Right is. The NRA has its supporters everywhere, but not to the ultimate good of the U.S. and it freedoms. Most of these are persons with a Fascists agenda, not a democratic one, but they disguise themselves behind the issue of gun ownership as if they are pro-democracy.

log out